Radiometric dating for children
They have their work cut out for them, however, because radiocarbon (C-14) dating is one of the most reliable of all the radiometric dating methods.”[iv] From observations, there are usually many daughter isotopes and evidence (including radiohalos) of those having come from parent isotopes, which are less abundant (which is to be expected).
Naturalistic/Evolutionary Answer: Radiometric dating has proven, over and over again, that the earth is billions of years old.
Radiometric Dating methods are absolute methods in determining how old testable items are. Therefore it should come as no surprise that creationists…have been trying desperately to discredit this method for years.
“Some of the methods have internal checks, so that the data themselves provide good evidence of reliability or lack thereof.”[ii] Errors will be clearly recognized when the data is analyzed.
“Radiocarbon dating doesn’t work well on objects much older than twenty thousand years,” because background contamination radiation will disrupt the results.[xii] Others suggest that C-14 dating is accurate to about 40,000 or 50,000 years.[xiii] “C-14 is forming today faster than it’s decaying.
However, it has fluctuated up and down over the past ten thousand years.
Search for radiometric dating for children:
This is determined by analyzing the radiocarbon dates of bristlecone pines that are themselves a way of dating based on the amount of rings, which is very consistent.”[xiv] Tree-ring dating coincides with and calibrates the C-14 dating results.[xv] The magnetic field strength would affect the creation and decay rates of C-14, but even though it has fluctuated over Earth’s history, it has been more or less the same based on archaeological and geological data.